StarGate: A Novel (Stargate #0.5) 
That being said, StarGate is actually decent for what it is. No one could ever accuse it of being a work of great literature, but it is entertaining, sometimes humorous, and on the whole not half as craptastic as other adaptations I've encountered. I mean, any book that refers to the "brick-shitting terror" of the Abydonians and has Daniel Jackson being sexually molested can't be all bad, right? Right. And though it's been far too long since I've seen the movie for me the be sure how closely the book follows the script, it seems like the writers at least made an effort to delve a little deeper than just what was shown on-screen.
I only had two major problems with this book. One, it was obviously done in a hurry and was full of pretty basic typos that could've easily been caught and corrected if someone (or someone actually competent) had been hired to proofread the damn thing. And two, the constantly switching perspectives is really annoying. I know it's not technically incorrect, it's just a pet peeve of mine; I hate third person omniscient with a passion. No, really. Hate. Passion. Like, burning. But anyway, if you can overlook those things, and you're a sci-fi fan, it might not be a waste of a rainy Sunday afternoon to give this book a quick read.
Review: StarGate While I enjoyed this immensely, I cannot give a high rating to a book that was edited by a middle schooler. Wow, people. They got genders mixed up, there were dozens upon dozens of wrong words, and the grammar. So many sentences made zero sense. I cannot believe such a terrible manuscript made it thru the process to shelves.
although written off by many as a conspiracy theory, this story is compelling and believable. I have met some people in the service in 1943 who say this strange phenomenon was a true cover-up and just think what we could have accomplished if we could have expanded on the project. The author takes readers into the thrilling happening.

The writing wasn't that good and it wasn't edited very well. There were misspellings and incorrect words, and some sentences that didn't make sense. Just watch the movie and tv series; skip this.
This is not just a book about archaelogy, space travel, ancient Egypt, artefacts, great discoveries... It's also about the borders we put to our minds, the stupidity of the daily routine... or probably of the origin of gods too.
I really wasn't impressed with this at all. I like the story itself which was introduced to me by the movie. The concept is great hut I found the writing to be kind of dull. I certainly may be biased by my Kurt Russell portrait of O'Neil or something but it just didn't work for me.
I enjoyed the movie. I loved the extra stuff the book included. One thing I remember was that the author's last name is Devlin, and on the Batman Forever soundtrack, there was a band called The Devlins, so that always made me smile (no relation, though).See also my review of Star Trek: TNG, All Good Things for how I came to own this book.
Dean Devlin
Paperback | Pages: 272 pages Rating: 4.05 | 1111 Users | 55 Reviews

Mention Containing Books StarGate: A Novel (Stargate #0.5)
Title | : | StarGate: A Novel (Stargate #0.5) |
Author | : | Dean Devlin |
Book Format | : | Paperback |
Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 272 pages |
Published | : | January 1st 1994 by Signet |
Categories | : | Science Fiction. Fiction |
Representaion Toward Books StarGate: A Novel (Stargate #0.5)
The thing about books based on screenplays is that, just like screenplays based on books, they're just never quite as good. Sad but true. I'd like to be able to say that the book is always better than the movie, because I'm a book snob and believe in the inherent supremacy of literature, but because I am a book snob, I'm forced to admit that this isn't always the case. In fact, with book adaptations of screenplays, the case seems to be that these are works of middling to no effort intended solely to cash in on the popularity surrounding a movie or television series.That being said, StarGate is actually decent for what it is. No one could ever accuse it of being a work of great literature, but it is entertaining, sometimes humorous, and on the whole not half as craptastic as other adaptations I've encountered. I mean, any book that refers to the "brick-shitting terror" of the Abydonians and has Daniel Jackson being sexually molested can't be all bad, right? Right. And though it's been far too long since I've seen the movie for me the be sure how closely the book follows the script, it seems like the writers at least made an effort to delve a little deeper than just what was shown on-screen.
I only had two major problems with this book. One, it was obviously done in a hurry and was full of pretty basic typos that could've easily been caught and corrected if someone (or someone actually competent) had been hired to proofread the damn thing. And two, the constantly switching perspectives is really annoying. I know it's not technically incorrect, it's just a pet peeve of mine; I hate third person omniscient with a passion. No, really. Hate. Passion. Like, burning. But anyway, if you can overlook those things, and you're a sci-fi fan, it might not be a waste of a rainy Sunday afternoon to give this book a quick read.
Be Specific About Books To StarGate: A Novel (Stargate #0.5)
Original Title: | Stargate |
ISBN: | 0451184106 (ISBN13: 9780451184108) |
Series: | Stargate #0.5 |
Rating Containing Books StarGate: A Novel (Stargate #0.5)
Ratings: 4.05 From 1111 Users | 55 ReviewsEvaluation Containing Books StarGate: A Novel (Stargate #0.5)
Review: StarGate While I enjoyed this immensely, I cannot give a high rating to a book that was edited by a middle schooler. Wow, people. They got genders mixed up, there were dozens upon dozens of wrong words, and the grammar. So many sentences made zero sense. I cannot believe such a terrible manuscript made it thru the process to shelves.Review: StarGate While I enjoyed this immensely, I cannot give a high rating to a book that was edited by a middle schooler. Wow, people. They got genders mixed up, there were dozens upon dozens of wrong words, and the grammar. So many sentences made zero sense. I cannot believe such a terrible manuscript made it thru the process to shelves.
although written off by many as a conspiracy theory, this story is compelling and believable. I have met some people in the service in 1943 who say this strange phenomenon was a true cover-up and just think what we could have accomplished if we could have expanded on the project. The author takes readers into the thrilling happening.

The writing wasn't that good and it wasn't edited very well. There were misspellings and incorrect words, and some sentences that didn't make sense. Just watch the movie and tv series; skip this.
This is not just a book about archaelogy, space travel, ancient Egypt, artefacts, great discoveries... It's also about the borders we put to our minds, the stupidity of the daily routine... or probably of the origin of gods too.
I really wasn't impressed with this at all. I like the story itself which was introduced to me by the movie. The concept is great hut I found the writing to be kind of dull. I certainly may be biased by my Kurt Russell portrait of O'Neil or something but it just didn't work for me.
I enjoyed the movie. I loved the extra stuff the book included. One thing I remember was that the author's last name is Devlin, and on the Batman Forever soundtrack, there was a band called The Devlins, so that always made me smile (no relation, though).See also my review of Star Trek: TNG, All Good Things for how I came to own this book.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.